Executive Orders (EO) are regulations issued by the President. They have the force of law. Provided that they do not conflict with federal laws and are within the President’s constitutional powers, federal courts will enforce them just as if they had been enacted by Congress. New legislation can revoke an EO. If the Supreme Court or lower federal courts find that it is unconstitutional, the EO will be nullified or canceled.
Executive Orders are internal orders within the Executive Branch to executive agencies, department heads, and other employees. Failure to comply may result in removal from office. You can think of it as a CEO in a corporation issuing a policy order to his executives and department heads. Thirty days after it is officially published in the Federal Register, an EO becomes law.
Executive Orders are not explicitly permitted in the Constitution, but Article II, Section I provides a grant of “executive power” and in Section 3 states “take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed”.
Critics accuse presidents of using them to make laws without Congressional approval or using them to change the mandates of existing laws.
One of the worst examples of the misuse of an EO, depriving US citizens of their constitutional rights, is Executive Order 9066. Franklin Roosevelt authorized the military to remove people in a military zone (targeted against Japanese-American and German-American citizens). On the West Coast, this paved the way for Japanese-Americans to be placed in internment camps.
A Presidential Proclamation “states a condition, declares a law and requires obedience, recognizes an event or triggers the implementation of a law”.
It carries the same force of law as an EO. The difference between the two is while EO’s are internal orders, proclamations are for those outside government. They are often specifically authorized by congressional statute and are often perceived as ceremonial or symbolic in nature.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment